Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700 is 771 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 199 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $87.75 vs $196.68
- Up to 56% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.49 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 24 vs 8 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
197
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
44%
Price, €
€218.32
44%
Buy for €218.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |