Buy on Amazon
€150.15
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $346
Availability
MSRP in USD: $346
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2762 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-640M - 167 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler - YD2700BBAFBOX
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-640M
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.