Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2336 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 25 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-640LM - 159 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7664 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |