Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 3738 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-10875H - 25 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-640LM - 270 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 16 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
