Buy on Amazon
€81.13
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $332
Availability
MSRP in USD: $332
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3766 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 25 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 280% better in League of Legends than Core i7-640LM - 171 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 12 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10400F (Base Clock: 2.90 GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.