Buy on Amazon
€446.35
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 365 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-5930K - 157 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $80.51 vs $402.12
- Up to 80% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-5930K - $0.57 vs $2.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-5930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
156
99.36305732484077%
Value, €/FPS
€2.86/FPS
19.93006993006993%
Price, €
€446.35
20%
Intel Core i7-5930K Processor 3.5GHz 0GT/s 15MB LGA 2011-v3 CPU Only, BX80648I75930K
Buy for €446.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €89.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-5930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5930K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell E | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.