Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-5820K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-5820K is 785 days older than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 182 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $314.37 vs $1166.95
- Up to 73% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1.92 vs $7.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 140 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 44 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€348.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1632 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
181
99.45054945054946%
Value, €/FPS
€7.16/FPS
26.81564245810056%
Price, €
€1295.31
26%
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1633 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
98.72340425531915%
Multi-Core
5443
56.58592369269155%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell E | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 22 |
12 | Threads | 44 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 145 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |