Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1509 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-5820K - 130 vs 114 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $281.51 vs $314.37
- Up to 22% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i7-5820K - $2.4 vs $3.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6497 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€312.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €312.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6496 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |