Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3047 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $314.37 vs $318.06
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-5820K - 402 vs 341 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-5820K - $0.88 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 32 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6489 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
402
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€353.05
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6487 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |