Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 2773 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 140 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 65% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-5820K - 546 vs 330 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $255.18 vs $314.37
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74736 minutes ago
Buy for €283.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
43.09063893016345%
Multi-Core
5443
33.551131110152255%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |