Buy on Amazon
€348.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 449 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 76% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3250 - 44 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $40.45 vs $314.37
- Up to 77% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-5820K - $1.8 vs $7.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel CM8064801548435 CORE I7-5820K Processor (15M Cache, UP to 3.60 GHZ)
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-3250 3.50GHz 2 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33250
Buy for €44.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.