Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3047 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 3% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i7-5820K - 272 vs 263 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $108.21 vs $314.37
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i7-5820K - $0.44 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €120.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |