Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 2682 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-5820K - 204 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $94.78 vs $314.37
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75697 minutes ago
Buy for €105.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75696 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
53.97859469520707%
Multi-Core
5443
79.14788425185401%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |