Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2068 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i7-5820K - 278 vs 270 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $145.55 vs $314.37
- Up to 55% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-5820K - $0.58 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |