Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 1326 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $135.27 vs $314.37
- Up to 57% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i7-5820K - $0.57 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 16 vs 12 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell E | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |