Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 1060 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 1200 - 54 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $219.35 vs $314.37
- Up to 28% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-5820K - $4.68 vs $6.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.46/FPS
72.44582043343652%
Price, €
€348.95
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
52
96.29629629629629%
Value, €/FPS
€4.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €243.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
84.82758620689656%
Multi-Core
2834
52.06687488517362%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell E | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |