Buy on Amazon
€348.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 678 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than FX-4300 - 184 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $35.11 vs $314.37
- Up to 87% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-5820K - $0.25 vs $1.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel CM8064801548435 CORE I7-5820K Processor (15M Cache, UP to 3.60 GHZ)
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 3.8 GHz 4 MB Cache Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4300WMW4MHK Socket AM3+
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell E | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.