Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 1906 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Athlon 3000G - 341 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
341
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€348.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6488 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Haswell E | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |