Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5775C outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5775C is 839 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5775C
- Performs up to 4% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 175 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-5775C - $108.95 vs $120.65
- Up to 6% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i7-5775C - $0.72 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5775C - 16 vs 8 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
93%
Price, €
€133.92
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for €133.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
169
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5775C | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |