Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 2753 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4930K - 161 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - $73.09 vs $73.12
- Up to 4% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4930K - $0.5 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 58 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |