Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $73.12 vs $169.64
- Up to 18% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-11900KF - $0.31 vs $0.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 87% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-4930K - 492 vs 263 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 16 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
263
53%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
492
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
81%
Price, €
€188.3
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |