Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $73.12 vs $186.45
- Up to 53% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.86 vs $1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4930K - 113 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 20 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
94
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
46%
Price, €
€206.96
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €206.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |