Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2521 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $73.12 vs $204.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10850K - $0.56 vs $1.47 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i7-4930K - 154 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
146
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
38%
Price, €
€226.44
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |