Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $65.77 vs $68.54
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-4930K - 122 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-4930K - $0.62 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €73.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15840 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.08
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €76.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |