Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Core i7-4900MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2524 days newer than Core i7-4900MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4900MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 47 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-4900MQ - 130 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4900MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2320 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4900MQ | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |