Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Core i7-4900MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2524 days newer than Core i7-4900MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4900MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 47 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-4900MQ - 259 vs 253 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4900MQ | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |