Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1955 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $146.15 vs $209.66
- Up to 21% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-9900KF - $0.23 vs $0.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Valorant than Core i7-4820K - 809 vs 701 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 16 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
701
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
809
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
79%
Price, €
€232.72
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for €232.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |