Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1470 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $146.15 vs $400.11
- Up to 61% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-7920X - $0.63 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Core i7-4820K - 275 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 24 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
258
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
275
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
39%
Price, €
€444.12
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €444.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |