Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $146.15 vs $164.51
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 51% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i7-4820K - 112 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 26% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i7-4820K - $1.63 vs $2.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 20 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17657 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.61
88%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |