Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-8700T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1674 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 31% better in F1 23 than Core i7-4820K - 214 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $145.5 vs $146.15
- Up to 25% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-4820K - $0.75 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4140 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |