Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700 is 668 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Core i7-4820K - 711 vs 681 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $87.75 vs $146.15
- Up to 42% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-4820K - $0.14 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
681
95.78059071729957%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
58.333333333333336%
Price, €
€162.23
60%
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57736 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
711
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
50.88940448569219%
Multi-Core
2440
58.93719806763285%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |