Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $146.15 vs $165.23
- Up to 1% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-10700F - $0.71 vs $0.72 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 11% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-4820K - 255 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 16 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
229
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17707 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
98%
Price, €
€183.41
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for €183.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17708 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |