Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1220 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4820K - 163 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $50.45 vs $146.15
- Up to 67% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4820K - $0.34 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10082 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10083 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |