Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4820K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4820K is 730 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - 101 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $29.18 vs $146.15
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77628 minutes ago
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
88.29787234042553%
Multi-Core
992
40.65573770491803%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |