Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1439 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $69.47 vs $196.68
- Up to 62% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.76 vs $2.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-4820K - 109 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 24 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
101
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2/FPS
38%
Price, €
€218.32
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €218.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |