Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1460 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than Core i7-4820K - 671 vs 621 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $80.42 vs $146.15
- Up to 50% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-4820K - $0.13 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 16 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
671
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |