Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2501 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $146.15 vs $237.63
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 17% better in Minecraft than Core i7-4820K - 728 vs 621 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 24 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76684 minutes ago
Buy for €263.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
38.05668016194332%
Multi-Core
2440
24.32701894317049%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |