Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2135 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $146.15 vs $288.82
- Up to 47% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.82 vs $1.55 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i7-4820K - 207 vs 197 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 24 vs 8 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
197
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Buy for €320.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |