Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1691 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $146.15 vs $153.55
- Up to 1% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.75 vs $0.76 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Core i7-4820K - 224 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 16 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
215
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16729 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
98%
Price, €
€170.44
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16730 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |