Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4790T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $109.59 vs $199.72
- Up to 44% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10900 - $0.57 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-4790T - 220 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790T - 20 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
215
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €121.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
56%
Price, €
€221.69
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €221.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |