Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $109.59 vs $138.2
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 55% better in FIFA 23 than Core i7-4790T - 220 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-4790T - $0.7 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790T - 12 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
142
64.54545454545455%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
81.3953488372093%
Price, €
€121.65
100%
Buy for €121.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2016 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€153.4
79%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €153.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2023 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1150
52.607502287282706%
Multi-Core
3381
39.41018766756032%
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |