Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4790T is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Performs up to 22% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1610 - 169 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-4790T - $27.05 vs $109.59
- Up to 69% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-4790T - $0.22 vs $0.72 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
30.555555555555557%
Price, €
€121.65
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3928 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
138
81.65680473372781%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3927 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
37.04347826086957%
Multi-Core
739
21.857438627624965%
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |