Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4790T is 1449 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i7-4790T - $102.37 vs $109.59
- Up to 7% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4790T - $1.11 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790T - 12 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
93.27731092436976%
Price, €
€121.65
93%
Buy for €121.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1831 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1835 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1150
99.82638888888889%
Multi-Core
3381
69.84094195414171%
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |