Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790S outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4790S is 1208 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790S
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-4790S - $108.95 vs $123.57
- Up to 12% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-4790S - $0.91 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790S - 16 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €137.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |