Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4790 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $98.71 vs $131.6
- Up to 21% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-11600K - $0.73 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i7-4790 - 158 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
150
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
79%
Price, €
€146.08
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |