Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3872 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770K
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $74.41 vs $387.52
- Up to 76% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900F - $0.48 vs $1.99 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4770K - 216 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770K - 32 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
171
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14641 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.99/FPS
24%
Price, €
€430.15
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14639 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
84 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |