Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3503 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770K
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $74.41 vs $1023.66
- Up to 92% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-13700F - $0.62 vs $7.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 10% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-4770K - 147 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770K - 24 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
134
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18742 minutes ago
Buy for €1,136.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770K | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |