Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3503 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $54.8 vs $318.06
- Up to 81% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-13900F - $0.46 vs $2.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-4770 - 148 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 32 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
133
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
19%
Price, €
€353.05
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |