Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-7900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-7900X is 1485 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4765T - 107 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $301.86 vs $364.82
- Up to 24% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4765T - $3.13 vs $4.13 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 20 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €404.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18484 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€335.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €335.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18484 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |