Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Core i7-4765T - 230 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $188.07 vs $364.82
- Up to 51% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i7-4765T - $0.91 vs $1.85 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 20 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €404.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €208.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |